<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>There Is No Plan &#187; US Foreign Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thereisnoplan.com/tag/us-foreign-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thereisnoplan.com</link>
	<description>Risk-averse policymakers should not read this blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:35:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Continuing The Neo-Liberalism Discussion</title>
		<link>http://www.thereisnoplan.com/2009/02/27/continuing-the-neo-liberalism-discussion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thereisnoplan.com/2009/02/27/continuing-the-neo-liberalism-discussion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coolrebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neo-Cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neo-Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo-liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US hegemony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereisnoplan.wordpress.com/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Badd Bob of Planned Obsolescence has built on my discussion about Neo-Liberalism with a thought-provoking post that asks some fascinating long term questions about where US hegemony could lead. Badd Bob puts China at the top of his list of adversarial states, but he questions how forceful the US can be in establishing and directing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thereisnoplan.com/2009/02/27/continuing-the-neo-liberalism-discussion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rise of Neo-Liberalism</title>
		<link>http://www.thereisnoplan.com/2009/02/15/the-rise-of-neo-liberalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thereisnoplan.com/2009/02/15/the-rise-of-neo-liberalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coolrebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America At War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo-con]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo-liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US hegemony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereisnoplan.wordpress.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Neo-Cons are dead. Long live the Neo-Libs. It&#8217;s not just conservatives who believe that the continued hegemony of the United States is critical to the wellbeing of human-kind.  But the Neo-Lib prescription veers from the Neo-Cons very substantially after that. We neo-libs do not feel that military power is the key to our continued [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thereisnoplan.com/2009/02/15/the-rise-of-neo-liberalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time For A Change &#8211; China Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.thereisnoplan.com/2008/11/25/time-for-a-change-china-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thereisnoplan.com/2008/11/25/time-for-a-change-china-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coolrebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America At War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeasement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Axel Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china is our adversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Far East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns n' Roses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melamine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superpower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Foreign Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereisnoplan.wordpress.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes it takes an aging rock band to make a great point. Take Guns n&#8217; Roses new album, its first for seventeen years. The band&#8217;s insightful leader created a fabulous oxymoron, bringing together the words &#8220;Chinese&#8221; and &#8220;Democracy&#8221; for it&#8217;s title. Now that&#8217;s comedy. The Chinese authorities did what they always do in these situations [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thereisnoplan.com/2008/11/25/time-for-a-change-china-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

